Despite his effort to keep in consideration subjectivity, Nagel remains anchored into an indestructible metaphisical realism. It is the same mistake made by Chalmers, so that both of them, in their reasonings, continuosly swing between a honest consideration of subjectivity and an obstinate metaphisical realism. It is the general mistake of analytical philosophy.
1 Review on “What is it like to be a bat?”
Despite his effort to keep in consideration subjectivity, Nagel remains anchored into an indestructible metaphisical realism. It is the same mistake made by Chalmers, so that both of them, in their reasonings, continuosly swing between a honest consideration of subjectivity and an obstinate metaphisical realism. It is the general mistake of analytical philosophy.